[Commits] [svn:einsteintoolkit] Paper_EinsteinToolkit_2010/ (Rev. 46)

knarf at cct.lsu.edu knarf at cct.lsu.edu
Mon Apr 4 09:35:53 CDT 2011


User: knarf
Date: 2011/04/04 09:35 AM

Modified:
 /
  ET.tex

Log:
 more on design and strategy

File Changes:

Directory: /
============

File [modified]: ET.tex
Delta lines: +8 -5
===================================================================
--- ET.tex	2011-04-04 14:29:53 UTC (rev 45)
+++ ET.tex	2011-04-04 14:35:53 UTC (rev 46)
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
 other areas of science and hereby providing an immediate application
 of their research.
 
-\section{Design and Strategy\pages{1 Frank}}
+\section{Design and Strategy\pages{0.5 Frank}}
 
 The mechanisms for the development and support of the Einstein Toolkit are
 designed to be open, transparent and community driven. All the source code,
@@ -266,9 +266,11 @@
 discussion about the toolkit takes place on an open mail list
 ({\tt users at einsteintoolkit.org}). The regular weekly meetings for the
 Einstein Toolkit are open and the community is invited to
-participate, and minutes are recorded on the wiki\todo{check}.  The Einstein Toolkit
+participate, and minutes are recorded and publicly available.  The Einstein Toolkit
 blog requires users to first request a login, but then can be freely
 posted to. Any user can post comments to entries already on the blog. 
+The community heavily uses an issue tracking system
+({\tt trac.einsteintoolkit.org}), with submissions open to everyone.
 
 Despite the open design, some actions have to be restricted to a small
 group of maintainers. This is true for e.g. administrative tasks like the
@@ -276,9 +278,10 @@
 of spam. However, one of the most important tasks of an Einstein Toolkit
 Maintainer is also to review and apply patches sent by users, to ensure
 a high software quality level. Every substancial change or addition to
-the toolkit has, by not enforced consensus, to be reviewed by another
-Einstein Toolkit Maintainer, and is generally open for discussion on the
-users mailing list.
+the toolkit has to be reviewed by another Einstein Toolkit Maintainer,
+and is generally open for discussion on the users mailing list. Despite this
+not being enforced by technically it seems to work pretty well while at the
+same time promoting development.
 
 \section{Core Technologies\pages{0.5 Frank}}
 



More information about the Commits mailing list