[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #798: allow calculations in parameter assignments in parameter files
Einstein Toolkit
trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Thu Apr 19 11:46:26 CDT 2012
#798: allow calculations in parameter assignments in parameter files
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: rhaas | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: optional | Milestone:
Component: Cactus | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by knarf):
Right. The usage with (x+y) is so common that I didn't think of other
possibilities. However, the only other usage I found is ((x>y)*x+!(x>y)*y)
- essentially max(x,y) - which is also commutative. I don't think we
should really support non-commutative expressions here, this was probably
never intended. But you are right, this is beyond the scope of this
ticket.
What would be important here is: should entries within parameter files be
order-independent? I would argue that this would be a good idea.
Concerning an implementation: Yes, the parameter file would need to be
parsed multiple times: first for the active thorns and at least once more
for the actual parameters (#705). And yes, Cactus would need to track
dependencies.
> Writing to a parameter that has already been read would be flagged as
error.
Consider:
{{{
A::a = "=B::b"
B::b = 5
}}}
When parsing this line-by-line, A::a would get the default value of B::b
(let us assume 4), would be marked as being read, and the second line
would throw an error. But what we actually want is that A::a = 5, not 4,
and no error.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/798#comment:25>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
More information about the Trac
mailing list