[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #877: EinsteinExact arrangement should be added to the Einstein Toolkit
Einstein Toolkit
trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Mon May 14 16:59:07 CDT 2012
#877: EinsteinExact arrangement should be added to the Einstein Toolkit
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: hinder | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: ET_2012_05
Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by bmundim):
>>EinsteinExact_Test is correctly symbolically linked in the arrangements
directory. Any ideas what could be going wrong here?
>The tests require 1 process to run. Can you check that you are running
with 1 MPI process?
I was using two MPI tasks! It works fine with 1 MPI process. Thanks!
>>4) In the documentation it says that the code ignores initial_shift,
initial_lapse, initial_dtshift and initial_dtlapse. Per example above, I
don't think this is true.
>It ignores initial_shift, initial_lapse, initial_dtshift and
initial_dtlapse. The setting of the initial data for all of the ADMBase
variables is determined only by the initial_data parameter.
I am not sure I understood you here. The parameter file does need to set
initial_lapse, etc, to ShiftedGaugeWave (otherwise it uses ADMBase
defaults). So how come ShiftedGaugeWave is ignoring those parameters? It
extends them indeed.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/877#comment:16>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
More information about the Trac
mailing list