[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #877: EinsteinExact arrangement should be added to the Einstein Toolkit

Einstein Toolkit trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Mon May 14 16:59:07 CDT 2012


#877: EinsteinExact arrangement should be added to the Einstein Toolkit
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
  Reporter:  hinder                 |       Owner:            
      Type:  task                   |      Status:  new       
  Priority:  major                  |   Milestone:  ET_2012_05
 Component:  EinsteinToolkit thorn  |     Version:            
Resolution:                         |    Keywords:            
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Comment (by bmundim):

 >>EinsteinExact_Test is correctly symbolically linked in the arrangements
 directory. Any ideas what could be going wrong here?
 >The tests require 1 process to run. Can you check that you are running
 with 1 MPI process?

 I was using two MPI tasks! It works fine with 1 MPI process. Thanks!

 >>4) In the documentation it says that the code ignores initial_shift,
 initial_lapse, initial_dtshift and initial_dtlapse. Per example above, I
 don't think this is true.
 >It ignores initial_shift, initial_lapse, initial_dtshift and
 initial_dtlapse. The setting of the initial data for all of the ADMBase
 variables is determined only by the initial_data parameter.

 I am not sure I understood you here. The parameter file does need to set
 initial_lapse, etc, to ShiftedGaugeWave (otherwise it uses ADMBase
 defaults). So how come ShiftedGaugeWave is ignoring those parameters? It
 extends them indeed.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/877#comment:16>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit


More information about the Trac mailing list