[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #1932: ML_BSSN: other_timelevels Parameter Not Respected

Einstein Toolkit trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Fri Sep 23 08:50:35 CDT 2016


#1932: ML_BSSN: other_timelevels Parameter Not Respected
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zachetie@…          |       Owner:                     
      Type:  defect              |      Status:  new                
  Priority:  major               |   Milestone:                     
 Component:  Other               |     Version:  development version
Resolution:                      |    Keywords:                     
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment (by knarf):

 #1960 was marked as duplicate of this bug. It looks like a reasonable
 proposal to me to replace 'timelevels' by 'other_timelevels' in these
 cases. Concerning checkpointing: if other_timelevels is indeed 1, there is
 no need to store them. Would it be conceivable that someone might actually
 want to store them (and other_timelevels is set to a high enough value)?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1932#comment:1>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit


More information about the Trac mailing list