[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #1932: ML_BSSN: other_timelevels Parameter Not Respected
Einstein Toolkit
trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Fri Sep 23 08:50:35 CDT 2016
#1932: ML_BSSN: other_timelevels Parameter Not Respected
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: zachetie@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Other | Version: development version
Resolution: | Keywords:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by knarf):
#1960 was marked as duplicate of this bug. It looks like a reasonable
proposal to me to replace 'timelevels' by 'other_timelevels' in these
cases. Concerning checkpointing: if other_timelevels is indeed 1, there is
no need to store them. Would it be conceivable that someone might actually
want to store them (and other_timelevels is set to a high enough value)?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1932#comment:1>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
More information about the Trac
mailing list