[ET Trac] #2629: MoL_PseudoEvolution vs ANALYSIS

[Gabriele Bozzola]

#2629: MoL_PseudoEvolution vs ANALYSIS

 Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola
   Status: new
Milestone: 
  Version: 
     Type: bug
 Priority: major
Component: 

Comment (by Gabriele Bozzola):

Upon further reflection, and reading more carefully the previous message, my impression is that there’s no easy way to implement a `compute_every` function. I originally implemented the function following `WeylScal4`, which simply takes the modulo of the current iteration and the `compute_every` parameter. But, if I understand what is going on, this is not the correct thing to do, as I can see in my test runs \(unless `compute_every` is 1\). 

So, should `compute_every` be removed from the `canuda` codes and `WeylScal4` ? \(Or at least, forced to be 1 for backwards compatibility\)

--
Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2629/mol_pseudoevolution-vs-analysis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/trac/attachments/20220901/2749f27c/attachment.html