<html>#2175: Test "Single, stable neutron star" example
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td>Roland Haas</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>open</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td>ET_2018_08</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td>development version</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>task</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>minor</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td>EinsteinToolkit website</td></tr>
</table>
<p>Comment (by Roland Haas):</p>
<p>We updated the parfile in the repo recently to Bruno's shortened version which is closer to what is currently on the gallery. Note that Bruno's is very very short and only useful for tutorial where the short runtime of ~10 minutes beats all considerations of being a sensible parfile otherwise. See #2243 and comment <a href="https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2243/use-bruno-giacomazzos-tov-parfile-from#comment-51464681" rel="nofollow" class="ap-connect-link">https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2243/use-bruno-giacomazzos-tov-parfile-from#comment-51464681</a></p>
<p>This means that he results not (qualitatively match), thankfully getting rid of the confusion though it still persists with respect to the data in the original GRHydro paper. If we desire to remove that confusion as well we should change both the tutorial and the gallery to <code>2d_Poltytrope</code>.</p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2175/test-single-stable-neutron-star-example'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2175/test-single-stable-neutron-star-example</a></p>
</html>