<html>#2256: transfer ET wiki from mediawiki to bitbucket wiki (markdown)
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td>Roland Haas</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>open</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>task</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>minor</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td>EinsteinToolkit website</td></tr>
</table>
<p>Comment (by Ian Hinder):</p>
<p>Does anyone have any experience with using a Bitbucket wiki for such a large project? When I used the Bitbucket wiki a few years ago, I found the whole experience very painful. Unless someone has more recent and better experience, I would maybe try this out for a less visible project than the ET. Roland: I know NCSA uses Confluence, but I don’t know if the wikis are the same. </p>
<p>With Mediawiki, we benefit from the fact that there is a huge ecosystem of plugins and extensions and a long history of people adding desired features. It’s also open source. The Bitbucket wiki is, as far as I know, closed source, and almost certainly not as extensible. </p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2256/transfer-et-wiki-from-mediawiki-to'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2256/transfer-et-wiki-from-mediawiki-to</a></p>
</html>