<html>#1717: hwloc: lnuma & lltdl *really* required?
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td>Zach Etienne</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>resolved</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td>development version</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>bug</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>minor</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td>EinsteinToolkit thorn</td></tr>
</table>
<p>Changes (by Roland Haas):</p>
<p><table>
<tr><td>status:</td><td>resolved (was open)</td></tr>
</table></p>
<p>I downloaded the ET devel version (ca. Nov 26) on my (ubuntu) laptop and compiled it, using gcc.</p>
<p>I compiled to the linker stage, and the linker complained:
ld: cannot find -lnuma
ld: cannot find -lltdl</p>
<p>I found references to these libraries in:
configs/[buildname]/bindings/Configuration/Capabilities/make.HWLOC.defn</p>
<p>After removing these references, the code compiled and seemed (on the surface) to run okay. Are these libraries really necessary? </p>
<p>I ask because every time I need to install ET on a new machine, it would be more convenient if the step "apt-get install libnuma-dev libltdl-dev" were left out, particularly since reliable Internet access may not exist at that time.</p>
<p><strong>Keyword:</strong></p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/1717/hwloc-lnuma-lltdl-really-required'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/1717/hwloc-lnuma-lltdl-really-required</a></p>
</html>