<html>#931: CartGrid3D's dependency on Boundary
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td>Jian Tao</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>wontfix</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td>Cactus_4.0.0</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>bug</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>minor</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td>Cactus</td></tr>
</table>
<p>Changes (by Roland Haas):</p>
<p><table>
<tr><td>status:</td><td>wontfix (was open)</td></tr>
</table></p>
<p>CartGrid3D_ApplyBC in CartGrid3D is scheduled in BoundaryConditions, which is defined in the Boundary thorn. </p>
<p>I can see that this is related with the symmetric boundary conditions but could we handle it in boundary ?</p>
<p>It seems to me that it is not a good idea to have the grid thorn depend on the boundary thorn. While making boundary depending on grid is more reasonable if we have to introduce the dependency between these two thorns.</p>
<p><strong>Keyword:</strong></p>
<p>Comment (by Roland Haas):</p>
<p>Works as intended.</p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/931/cartgrid3ds-dependency-on-boundary'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/931/cartgrid3ds-dependency-on-boundary</a></p>
</html>