<html>#2626: Multipole is not OpenMP parallelized
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td>Gabriele Bozzola</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>new</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>enhancement</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>trivial</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
<p>Comment (by Gabriele Bozzola):</p>
<p>It turns out that the problem cannot be solved with one single pragma. It is still very easy to sprinkle pragmas in the for loops in the integrators. I did that in </p>
<p><a data-is-external-link="true" href="https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/einsteinanalysis/pull-requests/19/multipole-add-openmp-parallelization" rel="nofollow">https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/einsteinanalysis/pull-requests/19/multipole-add-openmp-parallelization</a></p>
<p>All the test still pass. </p>
<p>I used the new code to run the next checkpoint in one of my BBH simulations and I found that approximately 50 % less time is spent in the multipole thorn when using 4 threads. </p>
<p></p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2626/multipole-is-not-openmp-parallelized'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2626/multipole-is-not-openmp-parallelized</a></p>
</html>