<html>#2616: Add NRPyEllipticET to the Einstein Toolkit
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>new</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>enhancement</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>major</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
<p>Comment (by Zach Etienne):</p>
<p>I don’t think this “new” functionality qualifies as “bleeding edge”, as it was hashed out in the publication. It’s basically an empirically derived means to set a more optimal value for the damping parameter.</p>
<p>Also I believe “soon” means “within a few days”.</p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2616/add-nrpyellipticet-to-the-einstein-toolkit'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2616/add-nrpyellipticet-to-the-einstein-toolkit</a></p>
</html>