<html>#2789: Citation suggestion for Kranc
<table style='border-spacing: 1ex 0pt; '>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Reporter:</td><td>Zach Etienne</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Status:</td><td>new</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Milestone:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Version:</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Type:</td><td>enhancement</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'> Priority:</td><td>trivial</td></tr>
<tr><td style='text-align:right'>Component:</td><td>EinsteinToolkit website</td></tr>
</table>
<p>Comment (by Ian Hinder):</p>
<p>It is old and outdated, but I don’t think that’s a good reason to omit it. I’m not sure what the logic was - maybe we were trying to avoid asking people to cite too many things? I can’t think of a reason not to cite the Kranc paper now. <span class="ap-mention" data-atlassian-id="557058:56049c54-f8c2-4b6c-9b88-ab697c967495">@Erik Schnetter</span> <span class="ap-mention" data-atlassian-id="557058:f7fd5133-6eee-4385-a5e5-3e03342a0b24">@Peter Diener</span> do you remember any details of this decision?</p>
<p></p>
<p>--<br/>
Ticket URL: <a href='https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2789/citation-suggestion-for-kranc'>https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2789/citation-suggestion-for-kranc</a></p>
</html>