[Users] using WeylScal4 and Multipole for WF output -- scheduling issues

Erik Schnetter schnetter at cct.lsu.edu
Sat Oct 23 07:35:54 CDT 2010


On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> On 22 Oct 2010, at 20:06, Kelly, Bernard J. (GSFC-660.0)[UNIVERSITY OF
> MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY] wrote:
>
>> That was it, Ian. Setting those symmetry boundaries fixed the NaNs.
>>
>> Thanks again for spending time on this.
>>
>> Bernard
>>
>> P.S. I think a binary WF-extraction testsuite would be a good idea.
>> If you like, I’ll apply what you’ve shown me to the
>> qc0_mclachlan.par file, and send in the results ...
>>
>> (do I have commit privileges for EinsteinAnalysis/Multipole? I
>> suspect I’m doing everything anonymously right now)
>
> There are testsuites already; what we need is a practical example.  So
> I would just add the wave extraction parameters to the qc0-
> mclachlan.par parameter file in McLachlan/par (after checking with
> Erik).

Yes, please do that. Wave extraction should definitely be in there.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>   http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/


More information about the Users mailing list