[Users] Einstein Toolkit Meeting Reminder
knarf at cct.lsu.edu
Sat Jul 6 22:46:46 CDT 2013
Please consider joining the weekly Einstein Toolkit phone call at
10 am US central time on Mondays. As usual, you can find instructions
how to join on the following web site:
In short: the number is (+1) 225-578-4942 or (+1) 866-573-0359 and
the conference id is 118682#.
In addition to anything that might be brought up at the meeting I would
like to discuss the following points:
Currently we do have quite a collection piling up in incoming. This is
good. However, now it the best time to work on these, deciding about
the faith of these contributions. Doing so means that they should get
tested by someone else than someone from the contributing group,
ideally multiple maintainers. If we could do so at least for some
until Monday this would be great, but realistically we first probably
need to remind everyone what these are actually about. So:
I would like each author/contributor of the new modules to say just a
few words about each of these. Also, please mention how well tested
they are from the contributor's side (have they been built on a larger
number of machines, or only on very few / are they used in production
runs, ect) , and whether there exists sufficient documentation and
testsuites to be able to include them as is.
I created a README in the root of incoming where I would like to have
a very short status indication of each of the contributions. We
currently have in incoming:
In addition, there are tickets for inclusion of
ZelmaniQuadWaveExtract , CartesianCoordiantes  and
CoreCollapseControl , which each live in Zelmani . Same goes
here: please describe their current status (just very briefly).
Please let me know if there is something else I missed for inclusion.
- issues up for review
There are currently 14 issues up for review, which is a rather high
number. Issues up for review mean that someone already has put in
enough time and work to come up with a solution that she/he thinks is
worthy being considered as fix. What is not needed is a second pair of
eyes to decide if this is ok, or should be changed in some way.
Please consider going through that list  and help a few of these to
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130706/23954c44/attachment.bin
More information about the Users