[Users] Meeting Minutes

Steven R. Brandt sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu
Wed Oct 30 10:38:06 CDT 2013


There was talk of having Erik present something on benchmarks on one of 
these calls. I would like to request that we *not* do it on Nov 3, as 
neither Frank nor I can be there.

Cheers,
Steve

On 10/28/2013 06:40 PM, Roland Haas wrote:
> Present: Erik, Frank, Roland, Ian, Steve
>
> Release date:
> * run testsuite by week of Nov 11th
> * aim for release before Supercomputing conference
> * Erik will start the tests on all machines, will then assign failing
> tests to maintainers
> * ask if Bruno Mundim would want to run on their machines in Frankfurt
>
> Restriction in Carpet:
> * commit patch to disable restriction into outer boundaries (which can
> never be fully filled via restriction) after release
> * add TODO item to optimize communication algorithm
>
> * deferred tickets
> ** #590 deferred to next release
> ** #1425 not release critical, remove milestone
> ** #980 deferred until after release
> ** #1429 patch applied, asked Bernard for exact intel compiler
> identification to add #ifdef to TP
> ** 1317 deferred until after release
> ** 809 deferred until after release
> ** 1251 deferred until after release, assign to Steve
> * those with patches will be added to trunk very shortly after the release
>
> * tickets for release
> ** Frank: apply conservative patch and disable for all intel 13
> compilers starting from version known to fail. Backport more restrictive
> exclusion once we know of a known good version
> ** Roland: check if vectorization patch in PUGH needs to depend on
> Vectors (# 1411)
> ** Roland: apply first patch in #1395
> ** Roland: remove OPTIONAL_IFACTIVE from #1411
> ** Philipp: #1409 will include but add comment that Avec does not
> currently work
> ** Erik: #1360 (check if they even build, defer until after release)
> ** Ian: #626, #1075, #1387: delete faulty parfiles
> ** #1364 closed, suggest to require simfactories "make" option to be an
> executable with options. Needs to be documented.
>
> Running tests with different numbers of processors:
> * see comment in #1075 for decision on how to proceed if a test case
> asks for an explicit number of processes
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131030/9337e8e4/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Users mailing list