[Users] ET_2013_11 run performance

[Luca Baiotti]

On 1/23/14 11:52 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:11:40PM +0900, Luca Baiotti wrote:
>> OK, so the emails not being sent is a known problem.
>>
>> Here is the diff between my Gauss simfactory (emails working) and my
>> Noether simfactory (emails not working). Both are repository versions.
>
> Can you look at the difference of the post-processed SubmitScript files
> of one simulation that did send emails, and one that didn't? You should
> be able to find them in simulations/NAME/output-0000/SIMFACTORY/ .

It is below. Indeed non --mail entry is present in the Noether file.

Thank you,
Luca


 > diff ETGausstest/output-0000/SIMFACTORY/SubmitScript 
ETNoethertest/output-0000/SIMFACTORY/SubmitScript
7c7
< #SBATCH -J ETGausstest
---
 > #SBATCH -J ETNoetherte
9,13c9,12
< #SBATCH --mail-user=baiotti at ile.osaka-u.ac.jp
< #SBATCH -o 
/scratch/01154/baiotti/simulations/ETGausstest/output-0000/ETGausstest.out
< #SBATCH -e 
/scratch/01154/baiotti/simulations/ETGausstest/output-0000/ETGausstest.err
< cd /work/01154/baiotti/Cactus_Gauss
< /work/01154/baiotti/Cactus_Gauss/simfactory/bin/sim run ETGausstest 
--machine=stampede --restart-id=0
---
 > #SBATCH -o 
/scratch/01154/baiotti/simulations/ETNoethertest/output-0000/ETNoethertest.out
 > #SBATCH -e 
/scratch/01154/baiotti/simulations/ETNoethertest/output-0000/ETNoethertest.err
 > cd /work/01154/baiotti/Cactus_Noether
 > /work/01154/baiotti/Cactus_Noether/simfactory/bin/sim run 
ETNoethertest --machine=stampede --restart-id=0