[Users] Git transition

Erik Schnetter schnetter at cct.lsu.edu
Sun Sep 21 10:26:38 CDT 2014


Barry

Did my commit to LSUThorns/PeriodicCarpet cause problems? If so, you
can ignore it -- I can re-commit it in git later.

-erik

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> Barry
>
> The proposal seems find. There is no major reason to keep the svn
> repos open at the moment -- we can either commit patches to git after
> the transition, or re-open them if there is an emergency.
>
> Of course, Frank has the final say as he has admin access to the svn repos.
>
> -erik
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Barry Wardell <barry.wardell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We now have almost everything in place for the transition from svn to git.
>> Jenkins is back online and the tests are passing (although it is still
>> running from svn, not the new git repositories yet), so I think we can
>> consider the current svn trunk versions reasonably 'stable'. I propose that
>> we now freeze the svn repositories and not allow any further commits to
>> them. The primary reason for this is that it will help make the transition
>> easier; every time there is a new commit to one of the svn repositories I
>> have to go through a time consuming process of updating the git arrangement
>> repositories and manually checking everything is still working.
>>
>> Does anyone object to this proposal?
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
>> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/



-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/


More information about the Users mailing list