[Users] 2D simulations (axial symmetry) with GRHydro
Erik Schnetter
schnetter at cct.lsu.edu
Thu Dec 1 07:34:13 CST 2016
Jens
Yes, Cartoon2D should be possible with GRHydro. Apart from certain
technical difficulties (choosing correct coordinates, number of ghost
points, etc.), the largest problem I expect is that Cartoon2D will
interpolate the solution, and interpolation is not a conservative
operation. Thus I'd expect problems near shocks, discontinuities, and
surfaces -- problems in the sense of "the hydro scheme is inaccurate", not
in the sense of "segfault" or "nan".
Most likely -- and I have no hard information on which to base my opinion
-- what is necessary is a very careful debugging of your parameter file.
It's difficult to explain this in an email (and I might also be wrong) --
feel free to call in next Monday for more in-person advice.
-erik
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jens Mahlmann <jensmahl at alumni.uv.es> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am currently trying to set up an easy GRMHD simulation using axial
> symmetry. In the documentation I find the thorn Cartoon2D recommended
> for general axisymmetric problems. Is the use of Cartoon2D possible with
> evolutions in GRHydro? Doing my setup I do find a lot of NaNs in the
> Prim2Con routines.
>
> Thank you and my best from Valencia
>
> Jens
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161201/120b651f/attachment.html
More information about the Users
mailing list