[Users] WeylScal4 failing testsuites with ET_2023_11
Bernard Kelly
physicsbeany at gmail.com
Thu Feb 29 14:29:22 CST 2024
Hi Samuel. Thanks for the quick response.
For both code releases (ET_2023_05 and ET_2023_11), I have DEBUG=yes in my
config.
Now that you've pointed it out, I *could* recompile from scratch with
DEBUG=no ... but should I have to? And is this just covering up an actual
bug (as the name implies)?
Bernard
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:23 PM Cupp, Samuel D. <scupp1 at my.apsu.edu> wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
> Is your parfile setting the parameter presync_mode? Alternatively, did
> you compile in debug mode? I ask this because that function has the
> following code
>
> static bool presync_only = CCTK_Equals(presync_mode, "presync-only");
> #ifndef CCTK_DEBUG
> if(!presync_only)
> return true;
> #endif
>
> Unless I'm reading this section incorrectly, the code shouldn't reach that
> assertion unless its in debug mode or the mode is "presync-only".
>
> Samuel Cupp
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Department of Physics
> University of Idaho
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Users <users-bounces at einsteintoolkit.org> on behalf of Bernard
> Kelly <physicsbeany at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 29, 2024 11:58 AM
> *To:* Einstein Toolkit Users <Users at einsteintoolkit.org>
> *Subject:* [Users] WeylScal4 failing testsuites with ET_2023_11
>
> Hi. I just tried running a parameter file with WeylScal4 using the
> ET_2023_11 release, and it fails during the pre-initial stage, with screen
> output like the following:
>
> -------------
> NFO (CarpetIOHDF5): I/O Method 'IOHDF5_1D' registered: 1D AMR output of
> grid variables to HDF5 files
> INFO (CarpetIOHDF5): I/O Method 'IOHDF5_2D' registered: 2D AMR output of
> grid variables to HDF5 files
> INFO (CarpetIOHDF5): Periodic 2D AMR output requested for:
> ML_ADMCONSTRAINTS::H
> INFO (CarpetIOHDF5): I/O Method 'IOHDF5_3D' registered: 3D AMR output of
> grid variables to HDF5 files
> INFO (CarpetIOScalar): Periodic scalar output requested for:
> ML_BSSN::H
> ML_BSSN::M1
> ML_BSSN::M2
> ML_BSSN::M3
> cactus_sim_ET_2023_11_WS4_ORIG:
> /nobackupp19/bjkelly1/codes/Cactus_ET_2023_11/configs/sim/build/Cactus/main/RDWR.cc:336:
> int cctki_RDWR::CCTK_HasAccess(const _cGH *, int): Assertion
> `current_function->RDWR' failed.
> Rank 3 with PID 73750 received signal 6
> Writing backtrace to
> Kerr_LES_StandardSpin_VACUUM_dx032_WS4_ORIG/backtrace.3.txt
> -------------
>
> I tried to run the WeylScal4 testsuites too (Teukolsky etc), with the same
> "Assertion `current_function->RDWR' failed" message.
>
> Just to check, I went back an ET release (ET_2023_05), and did the same
> test, and the tests ran & passed.
>
> So did something happen between releases to change the behavior of
> WeylScal4? And would it affect other Kranc-generated thorns too?
>
> Thanks, Bernard
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bernard Kelly -- CRESST Assistant Research Scientist, NASA/GSFC
> Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory --- Code 663
>
> Phone: +1 (301) 286-7243 *** Fax: +1 (301) 286-2226
> Web: http://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sed/bio/bernard.j.kelly
> ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-4454
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bernard Kelly -- CRESST Assistant Research Scientist, NASA/GSFC
Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory --- Code 663
Phone: +1 (301) 286-7243 *** Fax: +1 (301) 286-2226
Web: http://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sed/bio/bernard.j.kelly
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-4454
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20240229/28f313c0/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list