[Users] Community question — reproducible q≈9 GW190814-like workflow for Einstein Toolkit

[Nadelynq]

Hello Einstein Toolkit users,

I’m Nadelyn Zoe King, an independent citizen scientist building a
reproducible Einstein Toolkit/CarpetX workflow for a GW190814-like q≈9
compact-binary benchmark.

The package is intended to manage preflight, parameter rendering, an
eccentricity-reduction pilot, three-resolution runs, Multipole/Psi4
collection, convergence and fixed-frequency-integration
post-processing, and comparison against public GWOSC strain. I am not
claiming completed COSMA8 results; the current goal is a transparent,
independently reviewable workflow.

I would appreciate community guidance on whether the workflow is
appropriately scoped for Einstein Toolkit, what machine and
configuration assumptions should be documented, and whether a
well-tested post-processing or validation helper would be useful as a
public contribution. If appropriate, I can share the source
repository, build/test logs, parameter templates, and a short
reproducibility note.

Thank you for maintaining an open community around relativistic
astrophysics software. I will also review the weekly-call and
contribution guidance.

Best regards,
Nadelyn Zoe King