<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Eloisa Bentivegna <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bentivegna@cct.lsu.edu">bentivegna@cct.lsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Nov 8, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:<br>
<br>
> I tested further, using Carpet instead of PUGH. I believe that the problem is in the single processor case of PUGHInterp, i.e. that the 2 process results are actually correct. Carpet gives identical answers for 1 and 2 processes.<br>
<br>
</div>Interesting, we concurrently did the same test, but I still did get differences. Can you send me your parameter file?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I used the Mercurial version of Carpet, and I disabled bitant mode. I attach my parameter file.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-erik</div></div><br>-- <br>Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>> <a href="http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/">http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/</a><br>
<br>