<div class="gmail_extra">On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Ian Hinder <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ian.hinder@aei.mpg.de" target="_blank">ian.hinder@aei.mpg.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div>I believe the requirements for inclusion should be that the code has tests and documentation, is considered by an independent reviewer to be of sufficiently high quality, and is expected to be generally useful. I think all we are missing is documentation and the independent reviewer (volunteers?).</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>What type of documentation is required? Currently there is only a basic README file. Should there also be some sort of Cactus documentation which describes the arrangement/thorns? Is there anything more than this needed?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Barry</div></div></div>