On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Erik Schnetter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The definition of the conformally rescaled Ricci tensor Rt[li,lj] has<br>
the comment "(* Adding Z term by changing Xtn to Xt *)". However, all<br>
the Xtn terms in the definition are still there. Does this mean that<br>
there is an omission in this expression?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>According to Dana, who wrote that comment:</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span style>I think that the comment just wants to point out the fact that in CCZ4 the Xt contains a Z inside. So the expression looks the same as for BSSN, but it is not, because Xt and Xtn are no longer the same.</span></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Barry</div></div>