On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Erik Schnetter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The current implementation of the CCZ4 formulation in McLachlan<br>
contains the expression (2/phi) in the definition of R[li,lj].<br>
However, the meaning of phi depends on the conformalMethod, and this<br>
is not explicitly taken into account here. Is this wrong?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>So far, the CCZ4 formulation has only been tested with the W conformal method. In principal it should work, but given that it hasn't really been tested it is possible that there are bugs. In this case, this looks like a bug to me and this term should be different if the W conformal method is not used. Given how close we are to a release, should we just add a note to the release notes (or elsewhere) stating that only the W method currently works?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Barry</div></div>