<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Kentaro Takami <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kentaro.takami@aei.mpg.de" target="_blank">kentaro.takami@aei.mpg.de</a>></span> wrote:<div><br><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">> Do you also have performance data to support your statement that<br>
> OpenMP is slowing things down in this case?<br>
<br>
</div>Please see the attached file.<br>
Apparently the case (4) is the fastest, that is, OMP palatalization<br>
shouldn't be used<br>
for these small section.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>If I read the numbers correctly, then the original code is the fastest in all cases, sometimes by a factor of five.</div><div style><br></div><div style>
-erik</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>><br><a href="http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/" target="_blank">http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/</a>
</div></div></div>