<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Frank Loeffler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:knarf@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">knarf@cct.lsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:42:16PM -0700, Roland Haas wrote:<br>
> I would try and have both GRHydro and GRHydro_InitData in the same<br>
> repository<br>
<br>
</div>I agree here. We should not split test thorns from the thorns they test,<br>
if they depend on each other as closely as these two do, depending on a<br>
case-by-case basis. I don't really care how the final repository is<br>
called (GRHydro/EinsteinEvolve), or what else is in there. It would just<br>
be impractical to split these two.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I have moved GRHydro and GRHydro_InitData into EinsteinEvolve. The repositories are based off the svn versions, as suggested by Roland.</div><div><br>
</div><div>Barry</div></div></div></div>