<div dir="ltr">It's not a problem since we haven't yet included LSUThorns (also AEIThorns) in the conversion. I think this was because they are external to both Cactus and the Einstein Toolkit.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Erik Schnetter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Barry<br>
<br>
Did my commit to LSUThorns/PeriodicCarpet cause problems? If so, you<br>
can ignore it -- I can re-commit it in git later.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-erik<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
> Barry<br>
><br>
> The proposal seems find. There is no major reason to keep the svn<br>
> repos open at the moment -- we can either commit patches to git after<br>
> the transition, or re-open them if there is an emergency.<br>
><br>
> Of course, Frank has the final say as he has admin access to the svn repos.<br>
><br>
> -erik<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Barry Wardell <<a href="mailto:barry.wardell@gmail.com">barry.wardell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Hi all,<br>
>><br>
>> We now have almost everything in place for the transition from svn to git.<br>
>> Jenkins is back online and the tests are passing (although it is still<br>
>> running from svn, not the new git repositories yet), so I think we can<br>
>> consider the current svn trunk versions reasonably 'stable'. I propose that<br>
>> we now freeze the svn repositories and not allow any further commits to<br>
>> them. The primary reason for this is that it will help make the transition<br>
>> easier; every time there is a new commit to one of the svn repositories I<br>
>> have to go through a time consuming process of updating the git arrangement<br>
>> repositories and manually checking everything is still working.<br>
>><br>
>> Does anyone object to this proposal?<br>
>><br>
>> Barry<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Users@einsteintoolkit.org">Users@einsteintoolkit.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>><br>
> <a href="http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/" target="_blank">http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>><br>
<a href="http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/" target="_blank">http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>