<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>I made a parfile for the test just by modifying static_tov.par to induce collpase. Please find the attached files. The figure shows manifest difference between ppm+v vs. ppm+Wv reconstruction. For the case of WENO+Ideal gas EOS, the two test lines show nice agreement.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br><br></div>Hee Il<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-12-05 21:59 GMT+09:00 Roland Haas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roland.haas@physics.gatech.edu" target="_blank">roland.haas@physics.gatech.edu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello Hee Il,<br>
<span class=""><br>
> Yes, the routines of PPM for "poly" are highly suspicious. I can't make<br>
> comparisons for the different numbers but the star didn't rotate very fast.<br>
> The evolution pattern (e.g. rho.max) was different, resulting in a black<br>
> hole with an wrong mass, contrary to the case with the velocity<br>
> reconstruction. I'm sorry I can't continue the test at the moment but<br>
> MP5+Ideal EOS was also good without showing any difference.<br>
</span>Ok. Would it be at all possible that you attach the actual parameter<br>
file that you used? it would be fine to remove analysis etc thorns but<br>
very nice if we had a parameter file that demonstrated the issue, so<br>
that test runs are possible.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Yours,<br>
Roland<br>
<br>
--<br>
My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting<br>
and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from <a href="http://keys.gnupg.net" target="_blank">http://keys.gnupg.net</a>.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>