<div dir="ltr">I notice that some of our repositories (e.g. for the flesh) have accumulated quite a number of branches. Some of these are historic (dragged along from cvs!), some are outdated (last commit was 2013), others are active.<div><br></div><div>I suggest to clean them up. First, I'd like to propose that people who create a new branch should use their name as prefix (e.g. "eschnett/"); in this way, people have all the freedom they need when creating branches without creating confusion with umpteen scheduler-related branches.</div><div><br></div><div>If you already have a branch, consider renaming it; renaming a branch does not lose any information. At some point in the future, we may rename all the historic branches via an "attic/" prefix, so that the currently active an interesting branches stand out.</div><div><br></div><div>Also, the multitude of ET_ and Cactus_ branches is becoming noisy. Using a release/ prefix may help.</div><div><br></div><div>-erik<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>><br><a href="http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/" target="_blank">http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/</a></div>
</div></div>