<div dir="ltr">That's a clever idea. We should implement this.<div><br></div><div>No, it doesn't exist yet.</div><div><br></div><div>-erik</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Steven R. Brandt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sbrandt@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">sbrandt@cct.lsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm interested in a version of Prolongation=None which results in<br>
poisoning of the boundary region during the prolongation step. Does such<br>
a thing exist?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Steve<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@einsteintoolkit.org">Users@einsteintoolkit.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Erik Schnetter <<a href="mailto:schnetter@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">schnetter@cct.lsu.edu</a>><br><a href="http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/" target="_blank">http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/</a></div>
</div>