#2629: MoL_PseudoEvolution vs ANALYSIS
| Reporter: | Gabriele Bozzola |
| Status: | new |
| Milestone: | |
| Version: | |
| Type: | bug |
| Priority: | major |
| Component: |
Comment (by Gabriele Bozzola):
Upon further reflection, and reading more carefully the previous message, my impression is that there’s no easy way to implement a compute_every function. I originally implemented the function following WeylScal4, which simply takes the modulo of the current iteration and the compute_every parameter. But, if I understand what is going on, this is not the correct thing to do, as I can see in my test runs (unless compute_every is 1).
So, should compute_every be removed from the canuda codes and WeylScal4 ? (Or at least, forced to be 1 for backwards compatibility)
--
Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2629/mol_pseudoevolution-vs-analysis