#2723: No boundary conditions registered for variables in group LEANBSSNMOL
| Reporter: | Vikram Manikantan |
| Status: | new |
| Milestone: | ET_2023_05 |
| Version: | ET_2022_11 |
| Type: | bug |
| Priority: | major |
| Component: | EinsteinToolkit thorn |
Comment (by Samuel Cupp):
I’ve never used this thorn, but I can hazard a guess. On the master branch, the function LeanBSSN_Boundaries doesn’t run until
schedule LeanBSSN_Boundaries in MoL_PostStep { LANG: Fortran OPTIONS: LEVEL SYNC: ADMBase::lapse SYNC: ADMBase::shift SYNC: LeanBSSNMoL::conf_fac SYNC: LeanBSSNMoL::hmetric SYNC: LeanBSSNMoL::hcurv SYNC: LeanBSSNMoL::trk SYNC: LeanBSSNMoL::gammat } "MoL boundary enforcement"
In the old approach, boundary conditions and ghost zone synchronization were completely independent. Now, we simply do both at the same time. Hence, scheduling like
schedule LeanBSSN_adm2bssn at CCTK_INITIAL after ADMBase_PostInitial { LANG: Fortran OPTIONS: Local SYNC: gammat } "Convert initial data into BSSN variables"
will naturally trigger warnings if there are no BCs yet. Additionally, the old method didn’t make it clear that the ApplyBCs scheduled at CCTK_INITIAL was an empty call that did nothing. Since the registered BCs look to be none, it doesn't actually matter. I thought this was resolved in Issue #2648. However, the changes aren’t in master. This ticket changed
schedule LeanBSSN_adm2bssn at CCTK_INITIAL after ADMBase_PostInitial { LANG: Fortran OP--
Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2723/no-boundary-conditions-registered-for