Well, let's start small then. I suggested Carpet since it is smaller than Cactus, or all of the ET. But maybe we should start out even smaller -- maybe with one of the CactusUtils thorns. Let's pick Formaline; this one has a formatting that's different from almost all other thorns anyway, and it doesn't see much development.

-erik

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Roland Haas <rhaas@aei.mpg.de> wrote:
Hello all,

> Anyway -- we should easily be able to all use the same version of
> clang-format.
Easily: Weeellll maybe.

On my workstation using Debian (testing) the only version that I can
easily use are: 3.4 and 3.5 . On my OSX laptop Homebrew installs a
version that identifies as 3.7 (no other version provided it seems, at
least brew search clang-format only finds the one formula). One should
be able to compile clang-format from scratch, I have never done so though.

I'd normally suggest to try this (now since it is at the beginning of a
release lifetime) and see how well we fare. However I don't know how one
would "undo" the use of automatic formatting of the repository during
the testing stage if we end up not liking the results.

Yours,
Roland


--
My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@einsteintoolkit.org
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--
Erik Schnetter <schnetter@cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/