Hi Petr,
With these symptoms I would first look at the initial data setup itself.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:42:07PM -0400, Petr Tsatsin wrote:
> 1) I just tried to run some of my "old" parameter files using the new ET
> release and I got some strange results. The parameter files which work
> completely fine for previous releases do not work anymore in a sense that
> for example for the binary neutron star simulations starting from LORENE
> initial data hamiltonian constraint blows up and central density become nan
> shortly after the beginning. Thus, I have a question are there any
> essential changes I need to incorporate in my par files due to the new
> release or the old par files should in principle work and give same results
> as before?
Are all past timelevels setup correctly?
In principle, the Lorene thorns
should do that, but I could imagine tests not covering this. How does
the data differ between an evolution using the old and the new release?
I am sorry, I cannot directly help with this. I opened a ticket, which
> 2) I'm trying to use ML_CCZ4 for the spacetime evolution and I found the
> example par file for BBH evolution in McLachlan/par/CCZ4/bbh_ccz4.par which
> does not work. I figured that this file was for the old implementation of
> the ccz4 inside ML_BSSN thorn and if I replace ML_BSSN with ML_CCZ4 and
> comment some of the parameters it works. However, I was wondering if you
> could provide a working example of such a file with ML_CCZ4?
might help others do it: https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1387
Frank