Hi Bernard,

   Is your parfile setting the parameter presync_mode? Alternatively, did you compile in debug mode? I ask this because that function has the following code

  static bool presync_only = CCTK_Equals(presync_mode, "presync-only");

#ifndef CCTK_DEBUG

  if(!presync_only)

    return true;

#endif

Unless I'm reading this section incorrectly, the code shouldn't reach that assertion unless its in debug mode or the mode is "presync-only".

   Samuel Cupp

   Postdoctoral Researcher

   Department of Physics

   University of Idaho

---

From: Users <users-bounces@einsteintoolkit.org> on behalf of Bernard Kelly <physicsbeany@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 11:58 AM
To: Einstein Toolkit Users <Users@einsteintoolkit.org>
Subject: [Users] WeylScal4 failing testsuites with ET_2023_11

 

Hi. I just tried running a parameter file with WeylScal4 using the ET_2023_11 release, and it fails during the pre-initial stage, with screen output like the following:

-------------

NFO (CarpetIOHDF5): I/O Method 'IOHDF5_1D' registered: 1D AMR output of grid variables to HDF5 files
INFO (CarpetIOHDF5): I/O Method 'IOHDF5_2D' registered: 2D AMR output of grid variables to HDF5 files
INFO (CarpetIOHDF5): Periodic 2D AMR output requested for:
   ML_ADMCONSTRAINTS::H
INFO (CarpetIOHDF5): I/O Method 'IOHDF5_3D' registered: 3D AMR output of grid variables to HDF5 files
INFO (CarpetIOScalar): Periodic scalar output requested for:
   ML_BSSN::H
   ML_BSSN::M1
   ML_BSSN::M2
   ML_BSSN::M3
cactus_sim_ET_2023_11_WS4_ORIG: /nobackupp19/bjkelly1/codes/Cactus_ET_2023_11/configs/sim/build/Cactus/main/RDWR.cc:336: int cctki_RDWR::CCTK_HasAccess(const _cGH *, int): Assertion `current_function->RDWR' failed.
Rank 3 with PID 73750 received signal 6
Writing backtrace to Kerr_LES_StandardSpin_VACUUM_dx032_WS4_ORIG/backtrace.3.txt

-------------

I tried to run the WeylScal4 testsuites too (Teukolsky etc), with the same "Assertion `current_function->RDWR' failed" message.

Just to check, I went back an ET release (ET_2023_05), and did the same test, and the tests ran & passed.

So did something happen between releases to change the behavior of WeylScal4? And would it affect other Kranc-generated thorns too?

Thanks, Bernard

--

------------------------------------------------------------------
Bernard Kelly -- CRESST Assistant Research Scientist, NASA/GSFC
Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory --- Code 663
 
Phone: +1 (301) 286-7243 *** Fax: +1 (301) 286-2226
Web: http://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sed/bio/bernard.j.kelly
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-4454
------------------------------------------------------------------