Hi Erik,

Thanks for the perspective. Today after getting my macports back in shape, I have downloaded a new(?) the development ET and have built an executable including CT_MultiLevel. I've also run a couple of tests and all seems to be ok now.

Concerning the development version, when will it be possible to do git pull to get the latest dev version?  I use and contribute to one or two other software projects that use github and would hope since ET has or is moving to git that the usual methods of cloning various branches would be standardly available.  So, what can you say about when this will be possible from bitbucket.org?

Thanks.

Comer


On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Erik Schnetter <schnetter@cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
Comer

HDF5 1.8.15 is broken. A patch will be released shortly. The development version of thorn ExternalLibraries/HDF5 already contains a copy of the patched version; if you use this version of the thorn and specify HDF5_DIR=BUILD in your option list, you should be fine.

-erik


On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Comer Duncan <comer.duncan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ian,

I got back Monday night and yesterday decided to get CT_MultiLevel and rebuild so I can start learning how the multigrid stuff works with some examples.  I got the CT_MultiLevel directories from bitbucket, copied it into place in EinsteinInitialdata.
in the meantime I had done a weekly update of all my macports stuff (not a good idea!).  I then proceeded to rebuild cactus.  All went fine (the CT_MultiLevel seems to compile ok) until it got to iohdf5. It crashed complaining about iohdf5 stuff. I have pasted the build to http://pastebin.com/dqMtCL3A . Since the hdf5 stuff got updated I went through the procedure of deactivating and in some cases uninstalling hdf related stuff and believe I left it in the state in which no hdf5 is active.  I have pasted a record of the various steps I went through as I discovered what depended on what and tried to get hdf5 unactivated.  I believe I was successful. Please see the following paste: http://pastebin.com/4brgVdmE .  

With the optionfile having BUILD as the selected option for HDF5 as was the case when I implemented the workaround last week that you suggested.  

So now, I am back to a similar spot except that now I do not have mpi and/or gcc related issues. Also, I have the CT_MultiLevel stuff in place.  

Can you suggest some next steps which can get be out of this hdf5 fix? 

Thanks for the help!!!

Comer


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@einsteintoolkit.org
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--