Hello Hee Il,

> Yes, the routines of PPM for "poly" are highly suspicious. I can't make
> comparisons for the different numbers but the star didn't rotate very fast.
> The evolution pattern (e.g. rho.max) was different, resulting in a black
> hole with an wrong mass, contrary to the case with the velocity
> reconstruction. I'm sorry I can't continue the test at the moment but
> MP5+Ideal EOS was also good without showing any difference.
Ok. Would it be at all possible that you attach the actual parameter
file that you used? it would be fine to remove analysis etc thorns but
very nice if we had a parameter file that demonstrated the issue, so
that test runs are possible.

Yours,
Roland

--
My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.