I just updated the expert tutorial page since the ET_2010_11 release will stay in svn. Wget will still suffice since the thornlist will checkout GetComponents using git, and place it in Cactus/bin.

Eric



Bruno C. Mundim
December 28, 2010 11:34 AM

Hi Eric,

would you mind to update the wiki with the appropriate commands (git clone and path) for GetComponents?

Thanks,
Bruno.




Eric Seidel
December 28, 2010 11:16 AM

I have applied this patch. Going forward, development of GetComponents will be done on GitHub.

Eric



Erik Schnetter
December 23, 2010 1:31 PM


Shouldn't the binary live directly in Cactus/bin/GetComponents? The
CRL repository would live in repos, as usual, and the binary itself
would be a symbolic link. We can then do the same with SimFactory.

-erik



Eric Seidel
December 23, 2010 1:25 PM


I made the necessary modifications to GetComponents in svn to support this. I have attached a modified patch to add the git version of GetComponents, which I would like to apply to finally complete the transition. GetComponents will now live at https://github.com/gridaphobe/CRL, and I will add a LaTeX version of the documentation shortly so that it can be built with the rest of the Cactus documentation.

The transition will be a two step process (assuming you are using the development version): the next time you update Cactus, you will get the updated thornlist and svn-GetComponents. Then when you run GetComponents again, it will add the git version, which will be located in Cactus/bin/CRL/GetComponents. This seems to be the most stable process to me.

Eric


Erik Schnetter
December 5, 2010 5:09 PM

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Eric Seidel <eric@eseidel.org> wrote:
Erik Schnetter wrote:
Ah, I think I misunderstood. I thought you wanted to have a link to
the GetComponents script itself in the Cactus directory. Yes, a link
to the CRL directory makes sense; this is the "standard" way we handle
git repositories at the moment.
So I just looked into this, and it seems that GetComponents is not currently
equipped to symlink an entire git repo. This is a silly oversight on my
part; I can fix it, but that would require another patch to GetComponents.
Another possibility would be to create the 'bin' directory and link
GetComponents into bin. Then users could call './bin/GetComponents' or
possibly './bin/CRL/GetComponents', the latter would allow for documentation
to be linked as well.

I suggest to do both, to correct the fact that GetComponents cannot
link whole repositories, and to create and use a "bin" directory in
Cactus.

You could create a new project. Better now than later...
"GetComponents" is a rather specific name and limits the scope of the
project.
It is easier to just change the name of the project to CRL. This would
change the URL to http://github.com/gridaphobe/CRL. If I do this it would
probably make sense to change the URL on my website as well; however, I know
that ET and possibly cactuscode.org link to my website. Are there any other
pages that link to it?

I don't know. You can set up a permanent redirect on your web server,
which will automatically forward people plus leave a log entry on your
server telling you which pages to correct.

-erik