Dear Frank,<br><br>Thank you for your kind reply.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">2011/10/25 Frank Loeffler <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:knarf@cct.lsu.edu" target="_blank">knarf@cct.lsu.edu</a>&gt;</span><br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Would you be interested to summarize and discuss these results within an<br>
Einstein Toolkit call? We usually use plain phone for the calls, but<br>
would use evo as second option for opportunities like this, and we would<br>
announce it accordingly.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote></div><div>We would be 
happy to participate in the Einstein Toolkit conference call on Nov 7 
and discuss the paper, as well as our experience with GRMHD.  Please 
provide instructions for connecting to the EVO telecon.<br>
<br>All the best,<br></div></div><br>Zach Etienne<br>Yuk Tung Liu<br>Vasilis Paschalidis<br>Stu Shapiro<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/10/25 Frank Loeffler <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:knarf@cct.lsu.edu">knarf@cct.lsu.edu</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Dear Zach,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:37:01AM -0500, Zach Etienne wrote:<br>
&gt; We (the Illinois Relativity group) have been following the ET mailing list<br>
&gt; with great interest since its inception and were planning to send<br>
&gt; representatives to the upcoming ET workshop.  Sadly, we will be too busy<br>
&gt; preparing for the Midwest Relativity Meeting, which we are hosting the<br>
&gt; following weekend.<br>
<br>
</div>That is too bad indeed. We should find another opportunity in the<br>
future.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt; As many of you know, we currently evolve the vector potential to perform<br>
&gt; GRMHD simulations with divergence-free magnetic fields.  We found some major<br>
&gt; problems with our original implementation when evolving magnetized binary<br>
&gt; inspirals, such as BHNS inspirals.  We discovered that the problems were due<br>
&gt; to a zero-speed EM gauge mode, and after switching to another (Lorenz) EM<br>
&gt; gauge, we find huge improvements.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; We recently posted a paper summarizing our findings at:<br>
&gt; <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.4633" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.4633</a><br>
<br>
</div>Would you be interested to summarize and discuss these results within an<br>
Einstein Toolkit call? We usually use plain phone for the calls, but<br>
would use evo as second option for opportunities like this, and we would<br>
announce it accordingly.<br>
<br>
The call is always open to the public anyway - please feel free to call<br>
in. The next call will be Mon Nov 7th, at 10am central time, and usually<br>
an announcement is sent the day before.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Frank<br>
<br>
</font><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOptJ3AAoJEOkzpip+I59kN3AP/0O0R7G7mheYQa9odqTgLSF7<br>
++Cz/mLeTSjBnFkWg3jPxpJA9RaKtHoPJN0UjZsTy/zWq9b9arYQDNNH3kxQGUwr<br>
EQXgpfIDv6gdjnNteI10SlnvCPZIvz5UmJcn9zklpgDqe/uxoQClnvH/sy+xNlC0<br>
GdGwn+fTgyrxM4LG7/RMPDjGwsiPjhD9UxqIOpNQ3rC2qYzkUiNndUXPhXNkHru2<br>
r+8D9cLpk62iIO0lAfp/CurWrtgTU4dtkGU5kzs0lYtfHflQTXTrWX1pu0vkGeDn<br>
hHE/xNUnjGc2BpYNou9KSlmhMMUip/Wgj5G3DL8wNjTmBJlhlzI9/1Dd5e5QWpXh<br>
r3IDVLTixYFjTRMVMYqx2ouBSPGql8ZdXIsN02wvQxelq8U3Gzw8j6p35AwperiZ<br>
Sb3Mfh3Q1fw6cqTcTQOibaWqkN2rgZViSnwNISO6v6Fm/9NRzk1HDfRAq2ovtcBt<br>
6EBgJ9KWLmFZRr3ApamR2A9TVqVuw1ffcIGw4ivz1V+W8T7BDCPsI7sIkgf2ISV0<br>
hgIH65X2FfPaZXoeGizO2PwSHU3UM689ODrPXTYfIkmTUUHyx7jo6Af6dNvoxGbq<br>
j2AZtfhGaN67a2UkcQk59C5r8fgiz+a1LwGwS+z2GWGX/DlKCqJTWfU4pQTB7uUY<br>
JOGnQYvbNFKBeTP/5xtL<br>
=Twft<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>