On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Eloisa Bentivegna <bentivegna@cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
On Nov 8, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:

> I tested further, using Carpet instead of PUGH. I believe that the problem is in the single processor case of PUGHInterp, i.e. that the 2 process results are actually correct. Carpet gives identical answers for 1 and 2 processes.

Interesting, we concurrently did the same test, but I still did get differences. Can you send me your parameter file?

I used the Mercurial version of Carpet, and I disabled bitant mode. I attach my parameter file.

-erik

--
Erik Schnetter <schnetter@cct.lsu.edu>   http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/