[Commits] [svn:einsteintoolkit] Paper_EinsteinToolkit_2010/ (Rev. 295)

jfaber at einsteintoolkit.org jfaber at einsteintoolkit.org
Mon Mar 12 21:32:05 CDT 2012


User: jfaber
Date: 2012/03/12 09:32 PM

Modified:
 /
  ET.tex

Log:
 Minor stylistic changes to examples.
 MAde sure to thank the refs.

File Changes:

Directory: /
============

File [modified]: ET.tex
Delta lines: +23 -22
===================================================================
--- ET.tex	2012-03-12 20:37:30 UTC (rev 294)
+++ ET.tex	2012-03-13 02:32:05 UTC (rev 295)
@@ -2469,14 +2469,14 @@
 evolution of the black hole is not influenced by the imperfect boundary
 condition.
 We performed runs at 3 different
-resolutions: the low resolution was $0.024\mathrm{M} (3.072\mathrm{M})$, medium was 
-$0.016\mathrm{M} (2.048\mathrm{M})$ and high was $0.012\mathrm{M} (1.536\mathrm{M})$, where the numbers refer to the 
-resolution on the finest (coarsest) grid. Each refined grid had twice the
+resolutions: the low resolution grid spacings were $0.024\mathrm{M}/3.072\mathrm{M}$, medium were 
+$0.016\mathrm{M}/2.048\mathrm{M}$ and high were $0.012\mathrm{M}/1.536\mathrm{M}$, where the numbers refer to the 
+resolution on the finest/coarsest grid. Each refined grid had twice the
 resolution and half the side length of the containing grid.
 The runs were performed using the tapering
 evolution scheme in \codename{Carpet} to avoid interpolation in
 time during prolongation. The initial data correspond to a rotating, stationary Kerr BH
-perturbed by a Brill wave\cite{Brandt:1996si} and, as such, has a non-zero
+perturbed by a Brill wave\cite{Brandt:1996si} and, as such, have a non-zero
 gravitational wave content. We evolved the BH using 4th-order finite differencing from
 $T=0\mathrm{M}$ until it had settled down to a stationary state at $T=120\mathrm{M}$.
 
@@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@
 waveforms while the blue (dashed) curve shows the absolute value of the 
 difference between the high and medium resolution waveforms in a log-plot.
 The red (dotted) curve is the same as the blue (dashed) curve, except it is
-scaled for 4th order convergence, demonstrating fourth-order convergence.
+scaled for 4th order convergence, demonstrating we indeed achieve this.
 With the resolutions used here this factor is
 $\left (0.016^4-0.024^4\right )/\left ( 0.012^4-0.016^4\right) \approx 5.94$.
 
@@ -2663,15 +2663,15 @@
 \codename{ReflectionSymmetry} and \codename{RotatingSymmetry180}). The outer
 radius is located at $R = 120\mathrm{M}$, where $\mathrm{M}$ is the initial
 ADM mass of the binary system. We performed runs at 5 different resolutions:
-$3.125\mathrm{M}\times10^{-2} (2.0\mathrm{M})$, 
-$2.344\mathrm{M}\times10^{-2} (1.5\mathrm{M})$, 
-$1.953\mathrm{M}\times10^{-2} (1.25\mathrm{M})$, 
-$1.563\mathrm{M}\times10^{-2} (1.0\mathrm{M})$ and 
-$1.172\mathrm{M}\times10^{-2} (0.75\mathrm{M})$, where the numbers refer to
-the resolution on the finest (coarsest) grid. Two set of moving boxes, each
-centered on one of the black holes, are used, with the finest grid having side
+$0.03125\mathrm{M}/2.0\mathrm{M}$, 
+$0.02344\mathrm{M}/1.5\mathrm{M}$, 
+$0.01953\mathrm{M}/1.25\mathrm{M}$, 
+$0.01563\mathrm{M}/1.0\mathrm{M}$ and 
+$0.01172\mathrm{M}/0.75\mathrm{M}$, where the numbers refer to
+the resolution on the finest/coarsest grid. Two sets of moving boxes, each
+centered on one of the black holes, are used, with the finest grid having a side
 length of $2\mathrm{M}$ and each coarser grid having twice the size and half
-the resolution of the contained finer grid.
+the resolution of the grid it contained.
 
 Figure~\ref{fig:tracks_waveform} shows the two puncture tracks 
 throughout all phases of the binary evolution, 
@@ -2683,7 +2683,7 @@
 horizons were found by the \codename{AHFinderDirect} module and their
 radius and location information stored as a $2$-surface with
 spherical topology by the \codename{SphericalSurface} module.
-The irreducible mass and angular momentum (spin) of the merged BH were 
+The irreducible mass and spin angular momentum of the merged BH were 
 calculated by the \codename{QuasiLocalMeasures} module, 
 and were found to be $0.884 \mathrm{M}$ and $0.625 \mathrm{M}^{2}$, respectively.
 
@@ -2838,9 +2838,9 @@
 centered around the star at the origin, each doubling the resolution, with sizes
 of $240\mathrm{M}$, $120\mathrm{M}$, $60\mathrm{M}$ and $30\mathrm{M}$.
 We perform runs at 3 different
-resolutions: the low resolution is $0.500\mathrm{M} (8.0\mathrm{M})$, medium was 
-$0.250\mathrm{M} (4.0\mathrm{M})$ and high was $0.125\mathrm{M} (2.0\mathrm{M})$,
-where the numbers refer to the resolution on the finest (coarsest) grid. 
+resolutions: the low resolution is $0.500\mathrm{M}/8.0\mathrm{M}$, medium was 
+$0.250\mathrm{M}/4.0\mathrm{M}$ and high was $0.125\mathrm{M}/2.0\mathrm{M}$,
+where the numbers refer to the resolution on the finest/coarsest grid. 
 Each refined grid had twice the resolution and half the side length of the
 containing grid, with the finest grid completely covering the star.
 
@@ -2961,11 +2961,11 @@
 region during collapse.
 The outer boundaries were placed at $R=204.8\mathrm{M}$.  We perform runs at 4
 different resolutions: from lowest to highest the resolution are 
-$0.025\mathrm{M} (3.2\mathrm{M})$,  
-$0.0188\mathrm{M} (2.4\mathrm{M})$,  
-$0.0125\mathrm{M} (1.6\mathrm{M})$ and
-$4.67\times10^{-3}\mathrm{M} (0.6\mathrm{M})$, 
-where the numbers refer to the resolution on the finest (coarsest) grid.
+$0.025\mathrm{M}/3.2\mathrm{M}$,  
+$0.0188\mathrm{M}/2.4\mathrm{M}$,  
+$0.0125\mathrm{M}/1.6\mathrm{M}$ and
+$4.67\times10^{-3}\mathrm{M}/0.6\mathrm{M}$, 
+where the numbers refer to the resolution on the finest/coarsest grid.
 
 We use the PPM
 reconstruction method and the HLLE Riemann solver (see
@@ -3203,6 +3203,7 @@
 We are also grateful to the large number of people who contributed to
 the Einstein Toolkit via ideas, code, documentation, and testing;
 without these contributions, this toolkit would not exist today.
+We thank our referees for their diligence and their many helpful suggestions.
 
 The Einstein Toolkit is directly supported by
 the National Science Foundation in the USA under the grant numbers



More information about the Commits mailing list