[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #877: EinsteinExact arrangement should be added to the Einstein Toolkit
Einstein Toolkit
trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Mon May 14 16:13:38 CDT 2012
#877: EinsteinExact arrangement should be added to the Einstein Toolkit
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: hinder | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: ET_2012_05
Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by barry.wardell):
Replying to [comment:6 barry.wardell]:
> Replying to [comment:4 bmundim]:
> > I have looked into the arrangement documentation and I thought it is
really in good shape. I spot a few minor details there that would be good
to have it fixed/commented soon:
> >
> > 1) Eq. 4 is missing the 3-metric in the time derivative term.
> >
> > 2) Eq. 5 seems to have two matrices describing rotations around the
same axis. Is this intentional? I would expect to express the euler angles
in terms of rotation matrices around each of the 3 axes.
>
> Thanks for pointing these out. I will look into and fix them.
Point 1) has now been fixed. With regards to point 2), I think Eq. 5 is
correct as it currently is, although I can understand how it might not be
clear that that is the case. There are lots of different conventions with
how to define the Euler angles. The particular version used by
EinsteinExact is the one described at Mathworld
[http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulerAngles.html] and I believe is the same
as is used by Exact.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/877#comment:13>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
More information about the Trac
mailing list