[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #928: openmp parallelization within Exact broken
Einstein Toolkit
trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Mon Oct 8 14:25:36 CDT 2012
#928: openmp parallelization within Exact broken
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: knarf | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: confirmed
Priority: minor | Milestone: ET_2012_11
Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version: development version
Resolution: | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by knarf):
A single region implies a barrier at the end, doesn't it?
Of course it would be nice to avoid any barrier if possible. Exact was
designed such that the metric functions are 'grid-point local'. They
should not depend on something non-local like a 'saved variable'. In the
current case, would it lead to regression of performance to simply remove
'firstcall' and 'arad' and use the parameter de_Sitter__scale in the
computation of 'am'? What is the reason for having 'arad' in the first
place?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/928#comment:13>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
More information about the Trac
mailing list