[ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #928: openmp parallelization within Exact broken

Einstein Toolkit trac-noreply at einsteintoolkit.org
Mon Oct 8 14:25:36 CDT 2012


#928: openmp parallelization within Exact broken
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
  Reporter:  knarf                  |       Owner:                     
      Type:  defect                 |      Status:  confirmed          
  Priority:  minor                  |   Milestone:  ET_2012_11         
 Component:  EinsteinToolkit thorn  |     Version:  development version
Resolution:                         |    Keywords:                     
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Comment (by knarf):

 A single region implies a barrier at the end, doesn't it?

 Of course it would be nice to avoid any barrier if possible. Exact was
 designed such that the metric functions are 'grid-point local'. They
 should not depend on something non-local like a 'saved variable'. In the
 current case, would it lead to regression of performance to simply remove
 'firstcall' and 'arad' and use the parameter de_Sitter__scale in the
 computation of 'am'? What is the reason for having 'arad' in the first
 place?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/928#comment:13>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit


More information about the Trac mailing list