[ET Trac] #2789: Citation suggestion for Kranc

[Ian Hinder]

#2789: Citation suggestion for Kranc

 Reporter: Zach Etienne
   Status: new
Milestone: 
  Version: 
     Type: enhancement
 Priority: trivial
Component: EinsteinToolkit website

Comment (by Ian Hinder):

It is old and outdated, but I don’t think that’s a good reason to omit it.  I’m not sure what the logic was - maybe we were trying to avoid asking people to cite too many things?  I can’t think of a reason not to cite the Kranc paper now. @{557058:56049c54-f8c2-4b6c-9b88-ab697c967495} @{557058:f7fd5133-6eee-4385-a5e5-3e03342a0b24} do you remember any details of this decision?

‌

--
Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2789/citation-suggestion-for-kranc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/trac/attachments/20240402/8638df1e/attachment.htm>