[Users] Completing GetComponents' transition to GitHub

[Eric Seidel]

That would be fine too, I thought you had suggested that the entire 
repository be linked into Cactus/bin.

Eric

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Erik Schnetter <mailto:schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> December 23, 2010 1:31 PM
>
>
>
> Shouldn't the binary live directly in Cactus/bin/GetComponents? The
> CRL repository would live in repos, as usual, and the binary itself
> would be a symbolic link. We can then do the same with SimFactory.
>
> -erik
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Eric Seidel <mailto:eric at eseidel.org>
> December 23, 2010 1:25 PM
>
>
>
> I made the necessary modifications to GetComponents in svn to support 
> this. I have attached a modified patch to add the git version of 
> GetComponents, which I would like to apply to finally complete the 
> transition. GetComponents will now live at 
> https://github.com/gridaphobe/CRL, and I will add a LaTeX version of 
> the documentation shortly so that it can be built with the rest of the 
> Cactus documentation.
>
> The transition will be a two step process (assuming you are using the 
> development version): the next time you update Cactus, you will get 
> the updated thornlist and svn-GetComponents. Then when you run 
> GetComponents again, it will add the git version, which will be 
> located in Cactus/bin/CRL/GetComponents. This seems to be the most 
> stable process to me.
>
> Eric
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Erik Schnetter <mailto:schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> December 5, 2010 5:09 PM
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Eric Seidel<eric at eseidel.org>  wrote:
>> Erik Schnetter wrote:
>>> Ah, I think I misunderstood. I thought you wanted to have a link to
>>> the GetComponents script itself in the Cactus directory. Yes, a link
>>> to the CRL directory makes sense; this is the "standard" way we handle
>>> git repositories at the moment.
>> So I just looked into this, and it seems that GetComponents is not currently
>> equipped to symlink an entire git repo. This is a silly oversight on my
>> part; I can fix it, but that would require another patch to GetComponents.
>> Another possibility would be to create the 'bin' directory and link
>> GetComponents into bin. Then users could call './bin/GetComponents' or
>> possibly './bin/CRL/GetComponents', the latter would allow for documentation
>> to be linked as well.
>
> I suggest to do both, to correct the fact that GetComponents cannot
> link whole repositories, and to create and use a "bin" directory in
> Cactus.
>
>>> You could create a new project. Better now than later...
>>> "GetComponents" is a rather specific name and limits the scope of the
>>> project.
>> It is easier to just change the name of the project to CRL. This would
>> change the URL to http://github.com/gridaphobe/CRL. If I do this it would
>> probably make sense to change the URL on my website as well; however, I know
>> that ET and possibly cactuscode.org link to my website. Are there any other
>> pages that link to it?
>
> I don't know. You can set up a permanent redirect on your web server,
> which will automatically forward people plus leave a log entry on your
> server telling you which pages to correct.
>
> -erik
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Eric Seidel <mailto:eric at eseidel.org>
> December 4, 2010 11:26 AM
>
>
> Erik Schnetter wrote:
>> Ah, I think I misunderstood. I thought you wanted to have a link to
>> the GetComponents script itself in the Cactus directory. Yes, a link
>> to the CRL directory makes sense; this is the "standard" way we handle
>> git repositories at the moment.
> So I just looked into this, and it seems that GetComponents is not 
> currently equipped to symlink an entire git repo. This is a silly 
> oversight on my part; I can fix it, but that would require another 
> patch to GetComponents. Another possibility would be to create the 
> 'bin' directory and link GetComponents into bin. Then users could call 
> './bin/GetComponents' or possibly './bin/CRL/GetComponents', the 
> latter would allow for documentation to be linked as well.
>> You could create a new project. Better now than later...
>> "GetComponents" is a rather specific name and limits the scope of the
>> project.
> It is easier to just change the name of the project to CRL. This would 
> change the URL to http://github.com/gridaphobe/CRL. If I do this it 
> would probably make sense to change the URL on my website as well; 
> however, I know that ET and possibly cactuscode.org link to my 
> website. Are there any other pages that link to it?
>
> Eric
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Erik Schnetter <mailto:schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> December 2, 2010 9:40 AM
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Eric Seidel<eric at eseidel.org>  wrote:
>> Frank Loeffler wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>>
>> I think GetComponents
>> should be handled in the same way, and would omit the symlink.
>>
>> I wouldn't know how to do that without just coping GetComponents and not
>> having it in a repository.
>>
>> As Frank said, this would not be possible with the way GetComponents handles
>> git repositories. We would have to symlink GetComponents (or a "CRL"
>> directory). I'm not particularly happy with the way this is handled by
>> GetComponents, and I've been thinking about modifying the behavior to place
>> the actual repo in !TARGET unless something is specified in !CHECKOUT, but
>> that is another discussion...
>
> Ah, I think I misunderstood. I thought you wanted to have a link to
> the GetComponents script itself in the Cactus directory. Yes, a link
> to the CRL directory makes sense; this is the "standard" way we handle
> git repositories at the moment.
>
>> As to Erik's suggestion of placing everything in a single "CRL" directory,
>> that would actually be a more sensible name for the git repository. It also
>> holds my experimental generateCRL script, which generates a component list
>> based on the items you have checked out (only works with cvs and svn so
>> far). I don't know if GitHub allows you to change the name of your
>> repository, but I might change it if they do.
>
> You could create a new project. Better now than later...
> "GetComponents" is a rather specific name and limits the scope of the
> project.
>
> -erik
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101223/d8707563/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compose-unknown-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1421 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101223/d8707563/attachment-0002.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1417 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101223/d8707563/attachment-0003.jpg