[Users] Phone Call Mon, Nov 8th

[Erik Schnetter]

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Eloisa Bentivegna
<bentivegna at cct.lsu.edu>wrote:

> On Nov 8, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>
> > I tested further, using Carpet instead of PUGH. I believe that the
> problem is in the single processor case of PUGHInterp, i.e. that the 2
> process results are actually correct. Carpet gives identical answers for 1
> and 2 processes.
>
> Interesting, we concurrently did the same test, but I still did get
> differences. Can you send me your parameter file?
>

I used the Mercurial version of Carpet, and I disabled bitant mode. I attach
my parameter file.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>   http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101108/ea29988a/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Kerr-definition-expansion-carpet.par
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2144 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101108/ea29988a/attachment.obj