[Users] output from WeylScal

[Jose Fiestas Iquira]

Thanks. I checked the literature, and looked at the irreducible mass, given
by AHFinderDirect, which is growing in time, with respect to the initial
mass (ADM mass). By substracting I obtain an estimate (upper limit I guess)
ob the radiated energy during coalescence.

As mentioned I am seeking for a method to test/validate ETK tools together
with N-body using Post Newtonian approximations. I am using binary
coalescence.

My N-body code (up to 3.5 PN terms), can calculate strain amplitudes vs.
frequency, My first idea was to validate this results by creating the same
plot using ETK. Would you recommend a more direct way to do such a
comparison?

Thanks,
Jose




On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Eloisa Bentivegna <bentivegna at cct.lsu.edu>wrote:

> On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:12 AM, Jose Fiestas Iquira wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> > I am using WeylScal for BH binary coalescence, and I am obtaining
> 'weylscal4::psi4r...' and 'weylscal4::psi4i ...' files, with which I could
> plot the wave against distance/time.
> > Could somebody advise me how to get the energy emission due to grav.
> waves from the WeylScal output? I would like to construct a plot: GW Energy
> vs. distance/time.
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> there's a couple of things to keep in mind:
>
> 1) In broad terms, there is no notion of gravitational-wave energy
> density; one can at best associate a mass with the whole spatial
> hypersurface, but not state how much of this is in gravitational waves or
> where it is localized;
> 2) Under reasonable assumptions, the radiated power at infinity can be
> expressed in terms of the Weyl scalars. You'd probably best start learning
> about this is in one of the numerical-relativity textbooks: either section
> 8.9 of <
> http://books.google.de/books?id=4hDvRvVJeEIC&dq=alcubierre&hl=de&sa=X&ei=GBopT--LC87ItAbI-b3FAQ&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA>
> or section 9.4 of <
> http://books.google.de/books?id=dxU1OEinvRUC&dq=baumgarte&hl=de&source=gbs_navlinks_s>
> (notice that this is still a function of time only -- no localization);
> 3) If you're just interested in how much energy leaves the system during
> the merger, you may be better off subtracting the final horizon mass (given
> by AHFinderDirect) from the ADM mass (given by TwoPunctures).
>
> Let me know if this isn't clear enough!
> Eloisa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120206/34b0ed1c/attachment.html