[Users] Error to write PittNull during checkpointing
Yosef Zlochower
yosef at astro.rit.edu
Mon Jul 30 14:05:50 CDT 2012
On 07/30/2012 11:47 AM, Bela Szilagyi wrote:
> Yosef, and all
>
> 'start-up' here refers to the way the null parallelogram algorithm
> (marching out along a characteristic slice and starting from the inner
> boundary), gets its integration constants set by the boundary data.
> This is not a t=0 issue, but rather a \lambda=0 issue in CCE language.
> I believe it is absolutely essential for the correctness of the
> code.
>
> As far as changing parameters from non-steerable to steerable goes, I
> also believe they are useful as one can legitimately want to start a
> new diagnostic for a run when restarted from a particular checkpoint.
> Or even from the middle of a run, checkpointed or not. Those are,
> indeed, independent from the 'start-up' patch.
>
> I do understand that the Einstein Toolkit maintenance team may not be
> familiar with the Pitt code. Please regard the 'start-up' patch as an
> amendment to the 1st release of the code, by those same people who
> worked on it before releasing it. If you need any details of why
> have I changed things in the particular way I have, I will be glad to
> explain.
>
Bela et al,
It would probably be a good idea to have some kind of informative
commit message. Since you checked that these changes are correct and
necessary, can you commit them? I'll then update the testsuite, if
needed.
> Bela.
>
More information about the Users
mailing list