[Users] McLachlan/CCZ4: Z terms missing in Rt[li,lj]?

[Barry Wardell]

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>wrote:

> The definition of the conformally rescaled Ricci tensor Rt[li,lj] has
> the comment "(* Adding Z term by changing Xtn to Xt *)". However, all
> the Xtn terms in the definition are still there. Does this mean that
> there is an omission in this expression?


According to Dana, who wrote that comment:

I think that the comment just wants to point out the fact that in CCZ4 the
> Xt contains a Z inside. So the expression looks the same as for BSSN, but
> it is not, because Xt and Xtn are no longer the same.


Barry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120518/39fed666/attachment-0001.html