[Users] McLachlan/CCZ4: Z terms missing in Rt[li,lj]?

[Daniela Alic]

I think that the comment just wants to point out the fact that in CCZ4 the Xt contains a Z inside. So the expression looks the same as for BSSN, but it is not, because Xt and Xtn are no longer the same.

Sent from my iPhone

On 18.05.2012, at 20:01, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:

> The definition of the conformally rescaled Ricci tensor Rt[li,lj] has
> the comment "(* Adding Z term by changing Xtn to Xt *)". However, all
> the Xtn terms in the definition are still there. Does this mean that
> there is an omission in this expression?
> 
> -erik
> 
> -- 
> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users